Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Exp Dent Res ; 6(6): 596-601, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32918518

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The clinical attachment level (CAL) and radiographically assessed bone levels are used to assess the loss of periodontal tissue support in periodontitis, a chronic, multifactorial inflammatory disease of the periodontium. However, few studies have been done to study the relationship between these two parameters. According to our knowledge, this is the first study investigating the relationship between the two measurements using intraclass correlation analysis. AIM: The aim of the study is to investigate the relationship between CAL and radiographically assessed bone level in teeth affected with periodontitis. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted by selecting a sample of 880 periodontal sites in 104 periodontitis patients, aged 25-60 years. CAL and peri-apical radiographs of the selected sites were obtained from the computerized patient records. The distance from the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) to the base of the alveolar bone level (ABL) was measured. The data was analyzed using SPSS. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation analysis (ICC) revealed a moderate degree of reliability between CAL and CEJ to ABL measurements. The average ICC was 0.68 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.53-0.77 (p < .001) indicating moderate to good reliability. Comparing the types of teeth, the central incisors, particularly the lower central incisors showed the highest ICC values (ICC: 0.822, CI: 0.77-0.86) indicating good reliability while the premolar and molars showed poor to moderate agreement (Maxillary premolars ICC: 0.464, CI: -0.18-0.74; maxillary first molar ICC: 0.516, CI: -0.154-0.772; mandibular first premolar ICC: 0.662, CI: 0.269-0.782; mandibular first molar ICC: 0.625, CI: 0.31-0.82). A moderate correlation existed between the radiographic and the clinical assessments (r = 0.5, p < .001). CONCLUSION: Despite the fact that significant varying levels of reliability has been found between CAL and radiographic bone level, both the clinical and radiographic examinations should be performed for the accuracy of diagnosis.


Assuntos
Perda do Osso Alveolar/diagnóstico , Processo Alveolar/diagnóstico por imagem , Periodontite/complicações , Adulto , Idoso , Perda do Osso Alveolar/imunologia , Processo Alveolar/patologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Incisivo/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Periodontite/diagnóstico , Periodontite/imunologia , Periodontite/patologia , Periodonto/imunologia , Periodonto/patologia , Radiografia Dentária , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...